nw.johnson at ieee.org
Thu Feb 27 18:20:47 CST 2020
If your reference to D-sub means the connectors originally made by
ITT-Cannon, I can offer the following from a cutout from a trade catalog
that I have carried around these last 30 years as ammunition against
those who erroneously use the term DB-9!
I wasn't sure, so I had to find it and can confirm that there was no
'standard' D-sub of 52 pins in 3 rows. The ones available were:
DA15, DB25, DC37, and DD50, that latter of which had 50 pins in three
rows. There was of course the famously mis-labelled DE9.
Could you have mis-counted the pins?
On 27/02/2020 18:37, Adam Thornton via cctalk wrote:
> I work at an astronomy facility. I get to do some fun dumpster diving.
> I recently have pulled out of the trash a plugboard with a male and a
> female D-Sub 52 connector. 3 rows of pins, 17-18-17. I took the
> connectors off the board: there's nothing back there, so this thing only
> ever existed so you could plug the random cable you found into it and its
> friends to see what the cable fit.
> I can't find much evidence that a 52-pin D-Sub ever existed.
> Is this just Yet Another Physics Experiment thing where, hey, if your
> instrument already costs three million dollars, what's a couple of grand
> for machining custom connectors? Or was it once a thing?
> (also posted to COFF)
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
You can reach me by voice on Skype: TILBURY2591
If time travel ever will be possible, it already is. Ask me again yesterday
This e-mail is not and cannot, by its nature, be confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass across the public Internet, easily readable by any number of system administrators along the way.
Nigel Johnson <nw.johnson at ieee.org>
Please consider the environment when deciding if you really need to print this message
More information about the cctalk