I hope this message arrives in the proper talking group as it is my first
reply within years of reading everything.
If you are getting chastised for using an old computer, just tell everybody
that even the worst modern virus of today does not fit inside the RAM of
your dinosaur, so you are 99.99% protected. Security through obscurity. Ask
your colleagues if they have the same level of protection given only by the
existence of any of their systems, and no other additional software.
I am writing this from an old terminal connected to a FELIX C-256 Romanian
made mainframe from the 1970s. That is a clone of the French IRIS-50 made
by Companie Internationale pour Informatique.
Now that's an ugly beast.
Try to telnet to some modern small system running some BSD / Linux, which
talks to the world, then use BitchX or some other text-based IRC client to
chat.
I am sorry I am in a hurry, big boss at work wants his paperwork done.
Best regards
Vasile Buruiana
Doctor of communist digital dinosaurs
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 8:00 PM <cctalk-request(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
cctalk-request(a)classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner(a)classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Chat program for RSX (Jacob Ritorto)
2. Re: Chat program for RSX (Daniel Seagraves)
3. Re: Chat program for RSX (emanuel stiebler)
4. Re: Chat program for RSX (ben)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:47:31 -0500
From: Jacob Ritorto <jacob.ritorto(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [cctalk] Chat program for RSX
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <CA5293FC-836F-4D0C-AE16-9404CF0E7E8A(a)gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
I like period correct hardware terminals for authentic immersion feels and
have been tending to RSX (and UNIX) PDP-11s since my teen years, quite a
long time now. I keep them in my living room and den, etc. Convincing
setups that quite look the part. And actually *are* the part; running much
as though it’s still 1986. Very little emulation “cheating.” Real SMD
disks, even, sometimes.
Anyway, one of the many fun things I do with them is chat rooms. People
are like, “you connected here on a WHAT?”
In doing this I find myself often chastised by my esteemed Internet
colleagues for using such “horrible” computers because “That’s the worst
possible computer you could pick” (real quote, minus some aspersions about
power consumption) and “what loser can’t scroll up and look through chat
that’s more than 24 lines back?!?”
I try to ignore all this in the name of “progress,” but, I mean, they have
a point. As much as I’m having a nice time with all this, it does hurt
quite enough already for all the other obvious reasons and then I CAN’T
SCROLL BACK?!? Come on.
When you think about it retrospectively, this _is_ actually kind of bad,
right?
So What? Quit the real terminal and computer and use a modern laptop?
Hell no.
It strikes me that scrollback is a silly thing to condemn such a storied
lineage of computers over, but that’s exactly what’s happening in this
contemporary vale of tears. My friends think PDP-11s suck because they
can’t scroll (and, yes, perhaps some other things).
So I say let’s write a scrolling “terminal” program for RSX. Should work
with serial and telnet (BQT stuff) and DECnet (i.e. $SET HOST XXXXXX).
Actually maybe it doesn’t even have to know about that layer, right?
(Thinking as I write this). Spawn whatever command and it buffers the
output such that you can effortlessly scroll back up through stuff that has
scrolled past.
Something terribly rudimentary, perhaps, but with at least infinite
scrollback. Like just a dumb scroll back buffer wrapper thing. Writes to
/ reads from disk as you accrue characters / cursor up.
Heck, this would have been a boon in the day for normal use, right? Like
having a glass tty and a real paper printing terminal all in one! I can
scarcely believe it doesn’t already exist.
Would you folks be into helping with it? If not, I’ll try myself. Did a
bit of this sort of work some decades ago writing a disk imager under RSX
in MACRO-11 using QIO$ calls, looked up fresh from the orange binders
sitting there on the couch. Pretty easy.
Should we take from screen or tmux? Or do a clean room concept, you think?
I hope it can work under RSX and UNIX. RSTS/e, too, anyone? RT?
If you have opinions about this or if it already exists, let me know, pls.
thx
jake
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 07:57:48 -0600
From: Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav(a)lunar-tokyo.net>
Subject: [cctalk] Re: Chat program for RSX
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <6656C51C-12BD-4D8F-8419-C82A0439A88F(a)lunar-tokyo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On Feb 15, 2026, at 11:47 PM, Jacob Ritorto via
cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi,
I like period correct hardware terminals for authentic immersion feels
and have been tending to RSX (and UNIX) PDP-11s since my teen years, quite
a long time now. I keep them in my living room and den, etc. Convincing
setups that quite look the part. And actually *are* the part; running much
as though it’s still 1986. Very little emulation “cheating.” Real SMD
disks, even, sometimes.
Anyway, one of the many fun things I do with them is chat rooms. People
are like, “you connected here on a WHAT?”
In doing this I find myself often chastised by my esteemed Internet
colleagues for using such “horrible” computers because “That’s the worst
possible computer you could pick” (real quote, minus some aspersions about
power consumption) and “what loser can’t scroll up and look through chat
that’s more than 24 lines back?!?”
I try to ignore all this in the name of “progress,” but, I mean, they
have a point. As much as I’m having a nice time with all this, it does
hurt quite enough already for all the other obvious reasons and then I
CAN’T SCROLL BACK?!? Come on.
If you have a decwriter or teletype instead of a glass tty, your scroll
back is however much paper you can keep around.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:16:34 -0500
From: emanuel stiebler <emu(a)e-bbes.com>
Subject: [cctalk] Re: Chat program for RSX
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <c0be7865-5bb1-4d7a-8b2d-cbb9955549e0(a)e-bbes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 2026-02-16 08:57, Daniel Seagraves via cctalk wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2026, at 11:47 PM, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like period correct hardware terminals for authentic immersion feels
and have been tending to RSX (and UNIX) PDP-11s since my teen years, quite
a long time now. I keep them in my living room and den, etc. Convincing
setups that quite look the part. And actually *are* the part; running much
as though it’s still 1986. Very little emulation “cheating.” Real SMD
disks, even, sometimes.
> Anyway, one of the many fun things I do with them is chat rooms.
People are like, “you connected here on a WHAT?”
> In doing this I find myself often chastised by my esteemed Internet
colleagues for using such “horrible” computers because “That’s the worst
possible computer you could pick” (real quote, minus some aspersions about
power consumption) and “what loser can’t scroll up and look through chat
that’s more than 24 lines back?!?”
> I try to ignore all this in the name of “progress,” but, I mean, they
have a point. As much as I’m having a nice time with all this, it does
hurt quite enough already for all the other obvious reasons and then I
CAN’T SCROLL BACK?!? Come on.
If you have a decwriter or teletype instead of a glass tty, your scroll
back is however much paper you can keep around.
THAT'S the vintage spirit! ;-)
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:55:41 -0700
From: ben <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
Subject: [cctalk] Re: Chat program for RSX
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <28c01576-53b9-4478-aea2-74ddb54bb225(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 2026-02-16 7:16 a.m., emanuel stiebler via cctalk wrote:
> On 2026-02-16 08:57, Daniel Seagraves via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2026, at 11:47 PM, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk
>>> <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I like period correct hardware terminals for authentic immersion
>>> feels and have been tending to RSX (and UNIX) PDP-11s since my teen
>>> years, quite a long time now. I keep them in my living room and den,
>>> etc. Convincing setups that quite look the part. And actually *are*
>>> the part; running much as though it’s still 1986. Very little
>>> emulation “cheating.” Real SMD disks, even, sometimes.
>>>
>>> Anyway, one of the many fun things I do with them is chat rooms.
>>> People are like, “you connected here on a WHAT?”
>>>
>>> In doing this I find myself often chastised by my esteemed Internet
>>> colleagues for using such “horrible” computers because “That’s the
>>> worst possible computer you could pick” (real quote, minus some
>>> aspersions about power consumption) and “what loser can’t scroll up
>>> and look through chat that’s more than 24 lines back?!?”
>>>
>>> I try to ignore all this in the name of “progress,” but, I mean, they
>>> have a point. As much as I’m having a nice time with all this, it
>>> does hurt quite enough already for all the other obvious reasons and
>>> then I CAN’T SCROLL BACK?!? Come on.
>>
>> If you have a decwriter or teletype instead of a glass tty, your
>> scroll back is however much paper you can keep around.
>>
> THAT'S the vintage spirit! ;-)
Punched cards :)
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 1123, Issue 1
***************************************