agreed, not a 9x00. anice writeup btw...
I have mostly program docs from the 110x era but some hardware docs. Its
worth preserving this info
b
On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 2:16 PM Brent Hilpert via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 2026May 16,, at 10:54 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
wrote:
I have found that you can use the UNIVAC news for research, but it takes
some time. They often had deployment / sales announcements that are
useful
to learn what was sold and when. If you know
what company or industry
the
component you have came from, you might be able
to find a sales
announcement about it something similar. This might help you determine
who
typically bought what, and you might get a clue
as to the origin of your
component that way.
Nothing known about it’s providence, at least as relayed to me. Don’t even
know if its active life was in the local region or it it was transported
here after decommission. Granted that knowing of an 1108/6 that was used
locally could have been a probable source. Local region is Victoria, B.C.,
large enough for such a machine to have been around but not like a really
large metro/industrial area.
You may have ruled other UNIVC systems sold in
1971, but are you sure
what
you have is not from a 9300 or 9400 system?
Here is some info and a few pics of 1971 UNIVAC 9x00 cards. These were
EBCDIC and compatible with IBM, you can count the bus pins of your
component to verify its likely system.
https://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=830
The 9xxx series machines apparently actually used plated-wire memory (!),
as well as being 8-bit byte based and with smaller memory modules
(increments in mem capacity), so not a good fit with this module.
I did look into other univac series, but in the web page I just listed the
ones that seemed more likely to have a chance at being a match.
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 5:16 PM Brent Hilpert via
cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I was asked to examine a large core module, it has a UNIVAC label and
part
> no, manufactured in 1971 but probably a
little older in design. No
> providence known.
>
> I suspect it is from an 1108 or perhaps an 1106, based on the reasoning
> presented in the web link below. I’m a little curious for a firmer
> confirmation though. 1108/6 documentation on bitsavers has been very
> useful, but what’s there doesn’t go deep enough into the hardware to
> provide a hard confirmation. Is there even an 1108 or 6 still in
existence?