31 Jul
2024
31 Jul
'24
6:57 a.m.
On 7/31/2024 7:25 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
I think you're referring to the GFX subsystem move, and I stand
corrected. If you're referring to NT 4 being the unified OS, I would
disagree.
A poor choice of words. I did not mean to imply the code was merged,
but that they had tried to offer feature parity in the WinNT tech.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain(a)jbrain.com
www.jbrain.com
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 06:14, Jim Brain via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
I was trying to be a bit pedantic, since I was correcting information in
the previous posting. I honestly did not remember 3.51, and I was not
sure if 4 used the WIn95 UI or a facsimile of it built from some of the
same source.
In the interest of facts, I don't think this
is correct.
Windows NT 3.1 utilized the Windows 3.1 UI look and feel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT_3.1
Windows NT 3.5 continued the 3.1 look and feel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT_3.5
OK, true but misses out a major release, the best one of NT 3.x.
I think it would be simpler to say:
NT 3.1, 3.5 and 3.51 used the Windows 3.1 UI.
NT 4 used the Windows 95 UI.
Windows 2000 used the same UI as Windows ME: it's a modified updated
version of the "Active Desktop" from Windows 98.
I was not aware (or, maybe I was, but it's been long enough I forgot)
Windows 2000
was supposed to unify the OS variants, but it didn't quite make it
(though I think W2K moved the graphics subsystem into the kernel for
better performance),
No, that was NT4.
and Windows XP
was the first unified OS
It wasn't really "unified" in any way. That was marketing spiel.