On 1/16/23 19:42, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
It didn't fall for your trick question.
Sellam
In fact, feed it the object code for a reasonably compatible
architecture and ask it to perform translation to another architecture's
object code.
Certainly within the range of human capability.
I don't know if Paul remembers the 1620 SPS coding forms -- one side had
the layout for the "1620 Symbolic Programming System"; the reverse had
the "1620 Absolute Coding System". (Yes kids, we really did write
object code without an assembler back in those days.)
The 1620 was especially suited to this type of coding; absolutely
regular machine instruction format (2 digit opcode, 5 digit P field, 5
digit Q field). All instructions were 12 digits in length--and the
machine was variable word-length decimal.
Take a hunk of obscure (to us now) assembly and ask ChatGPT what it does.
Again, certainly within the range of human capability. My point is
that ChatGPT is a great database inquiry tool with a fancy interface,
but the "I" is missing in "AI".
--Chuck