UNSBUSCBRIE
^C^C^C^\^C<ESC><ESC>:q!^Z^G^G
On 1/25/2025 5:55 AM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
Can this stop already?
Sellam
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 9:33 PM Frank Leonhardt via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 23/01/2025 23:00, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Robert Feldman via cctalk
>> <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The answer to your question is one that even mainstream physicists
> (Lord Kelvin) have gotten wrong in the past. Seehttps://
>
www.americanscientist.org/article/kelvin-perry-and-the-age-of-the-earth
>> Absolutely. Lots of earlier physics is either very wrong or actually
> only an approximation. (Newtonian gravitation is an example of the latter.)
>> This is why "settled science" is a crackpot notion. Galileo knew
better
> and explained it very well.
>
> All science is the best working theory until proven otherwise. However,
> theories can and disproven, and that's the history of science.
>
> No proper scientist believes any theory is the final word. However, they
> build on theories that have yet to be proven wrong.
>
> The theory that the earth is flat is clearly disproven. Aristotle worked
> it it was basically spherical, yet crackpots believe it's flat to this
> day - often because their scripture said otherwise.
>
>
>