On 06/05/2024 7:17 AM CDT Liam Proven via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
It isn't personal if an ordinary person can't afford it.
That isn't _the people_. The People means hoi polloi. It means
ordinary people. It means the masses. A personal computer is only
personal if the person in question is an ordinary Joe.
To my mind, there are two things that define a computer as a personal computer. The first
is what you say above, affordable by the masses. The second is "intended for"
the masses.
When the Jan 75 issue of Popular Electronics came out I was 9 years old. I didn't
know the magazine existed, nor could I have afforded a subscription if I did. But I knew
what computers were, and I knew I wanted one. But they were untouchable to me. I had
seen one at my dad's office, and even seen some programmers (up near the same category
as seeing an astronaut to me.) But having a computer was a dream, like owning an F-4
Phantom.
A couple of years later I saw the TRS-80 in a Radio Shack catalog. That was my first
sight of a "personal" computer. The price ($599?) was WELL outside what I could
afford, but it was achievable. AND... it was marketed toward "average" people!
Until I saw the TRS-80, owning a computer was a dream. After, it was a goal. I strongly
suspect that many people felt much the same way when they saw their own first personal
computer, whether it was a TRS-80 or an Altair or whatever. But very few had that
reaction to, say, A 9830. And the masses didn't get a flyer in the mail advertising a
5100 to them.
Just my 1/2 cent worth.
Will
Grownups never understand anything by themselves and it is tiresome for children to be
always and forever explaining things to them,
Antoine de Saint-Exupery in The Little Prince