24 Jan
2023
24 Jan
'23
10:19 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM Sellam Abraham via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
I submit that the //gs isn't even really an Apple
][ properly.
It's more like a quasi-Macintosh with really good (not perfect) built-in
emulation of an Enhanced //e.
That totally makes sense. I never got into the //gs and that kind of
frames it: I'd rather just use a //e (which is still late for me) or a
][+ but that's because I first used them back in the Integer BASIC
days (and watched friends do the DOS 3.2->3.3 conversion) then used
them heavily in 1984. It's just where my experience falls.
-ethan
Sellam