Ah, that 1.8GB TIF is just the cover page - scanned at 1200 DPI of mostly
white! That's nuts (that it ends up at 1.8GB, isn't TIF using LZH?) But
the COCR link is it (not apparent to me what COCR is referring to? but the
document is what I recall coming across a while back).
I scanned through the 1960s Datamations, and of the editions available
(thanks to bitsavers), two notable entries:
#1)
1962 March pg 58 "A Criticism of Inactivity" (in relation to "data
communication").
H. E. Rennacker basically complains about the lack of data-communication
standards across systems. It is insight to see the industry clearly
identifies the need and benefits of doing so, while also observing that
even by this time (1962) "RS-232" doesn't appear to be a fully
recognized/known standard.
[ my take is that the early DataSet 103A usage of pins is implicitly what
RS-232 "A" would be; the earliest DataSet 103A manual I see is from 1967,
even though the concept and similar equipment was probably in use a couple
years earlier ]
#2)
The earliest complete reference to "RS-232" that I found was not until the
November 1966 edition (where the entire issue is dedicated to the topic of
"communications"). Note that I understand RS-232 mostly relates to
electrical characteristics and form factor (with that 25-pin connector
coming from Canon in the 1950s?? Then as mentioned above, the Bell DataSet
effectively set the standard on which pins ought be used for what for
serial communication). I also understand this is just when things were
written down, in practice vendors were using all this again several years
earlier (sort of like later modem compression protocols, or even later WiFi
protocols -- to see if it was worth documenting, someone had to try it in
"at-risk-early-adopter" product).
Per regular Wikipedia on RS-232, it references " Standards for Computer
Aided Manufacturing" which has this to say about RS-232A and B:
**************************
7. Standardization Status: RS-232, May 1960; RS-232-A, October
1963; RS-232-B,
October 1965. RS-232-C is expected to be gradually (ten years)
replaced by EIA SP-1194A (see writeup immediately below).
8. Implementation Status: Commerically, RS-232-C has enjoyed
universal acceptance as the data terminal -to-modem de facto
interface. Although MIL STD 188C prescribes 232-C functions, it
employs different (lower voltage and lower impedance) electrical
characteristics , primarily for security and privacy purposes.
********************************
Looking at the dates, it seems to me RS-232-A (if May 1960) does coincide
with the DataSet 101 being more publicly known (c. 1959/1960), and RS-232-B
(if Oct 1963) coincide with the DataSet 103A's release.
Anyway, just poking around, no specific question here :) Wel, except a
related/unrelated question -- why does MIDI use 5mA current loop? And is
that why MIDI adopted the joystick port? (IBM original joystick card spec,
didn't it involve measuring electrical discharge? so it is effectively a
current-loop port? is that somewhat accurate?)
-Steve
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 12:56 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 4/19/25 21:16, Steve Lewis via cctalk wrote:
Hey gang, a few months ago I had found the
1968/1969 document spec of
RS-232. But now, I'm unable to find it again !
This what you're looking for?
https://archive.org/details/EIA-RS-232-COCR
--Chuck