6 Apr
2025
6 Apr
'25
1:50 p.m.
Dijkstra was my GOTO man for anything to do with computing! :-)
Nigel
On 2025-04-05 22:31, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
On 4/5/2025 8:23 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
And it was comments like those that convinced me Dyjkstra was an idiot
and I have never placed any value on anything he ever said.
bill
--
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591
In those
days, FORTRAN IV was handy as a "portable" language just
because it was the one language (other than COBOL) available
*everywhere*. It could be used as a sort of "high level assembler"
too.
"FORTRAN --"the infantile disorder"--, by now nearly 20 years old, is
hopelessly inadequate for whatever computer application you have in
mind today: it is now too clumsy, too risky, and too expensive to use."
- "How do we tell truths that might hurt?"
- Edsger W.Dijkstra, 18 June 1975
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore,
be regarded as a criminal offence."
- "How do we tell truths that might hurt?"
- Edsger W.Dijkstra, 18 June 1975
Dijkstra had things to say about many languages.
In 1975, . . .
Fortran77 or Fortran90 did fix a few things, but not necessarily the
right ones.