On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:30 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
SMPUs don't like that, and don't even try a variable transformers.
In the 80s, i worked for a company making just-pre-PC 8086 machines. We
manufactured the SMPSU in-house, designed by a specialist company. I was
involved in training the technicians to repair them and built a debug rig
with the designer's advice.
This may not apply to all SMPUs but worked well for that design, which was
fairly conventional.
There was an isolation transformer followed by a variac. The procedure was
to slowly bring up the variac until the control circuit was functioning,
check the waveforms around that, and then increase the supply voltage while
watching the chopper, control and output signals. This allowed the chopper
to work at low current limited by the circuit resistance and slowly
increase with supply voltage until the control circuit backed it off (which
would happen quite quickly with no output load).
I agree that low input voltage with a loaded output will stress the supply
but done carefully as above it should be possible. I didn't use a lamp, but
the idea there is that the maximum current in the case of a short is
limited to lamp current rather than fuse current. I wouldn't do this with
much of a load, but it's more likely to kill the chopper due to dissipation
rather than peak current since it's rated to chop the full input DC rail
into the transformer. Abuse might cause higher frequency cycling or longer
on-time but shouldn't increase peak current.
I'm happy to learn if I'm missing another mechanism.