20 Jan
2025
20 Jan
'25
1:49 a.m.
They guard against that now by using outdated training data. Not an
approach that will work more than once.
I think we'd all be happier if AI output had to be marked as such.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 7:02 AM Christopher Zach via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
As you get more ai systems running you just run into
the xeroxgraphoc
effect and it all falls down
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2025, at 1:11 PM, Chuck Guzis via
cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 1/19/25 09:39, Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk wrote:
What happened to them? They're everywhere in
academic papers. They've
become an easy way to get published. Nowadays they make up so many bio-
inspired variations of these algorithms that I think that they are going
to run out of animal names to assign to them. Most of these publications
are thrash, but there are a handful of genuine applications.
I recall reading that behavior predictions made by genetic algorithms
would enable one to corner the US stock market. Of course, that was
before 2008.
--Chuck