21 Dec
2022
21 Dec
'22
4:44 a.m.
Agreed (FWIW ;-)
Admittedly there are many alternate sources out there for information (and
misinformation) about relatively 'modern' systems, but there's also a lot
of informed, reliable and, dare I say, mature folks here with much to
contribute; it'd be a shame not to take advantage of their experience,
regardless of the age of the issue in question.
m
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:33 PM Tony Jones via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
Traffic on the list is so low I'm not seeing the
issue. I'm also not
seeing complaints about threads being off topic. Seems like solution
seeking a problem.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, 8:28 PM Chris via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022, 11:11:27 PM EST,
Fred Cisin via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
I was not disagreeing with you.
Ok. Wonderful. I guess we've sufficiently established that from
henceforth
anything dang-old is totally on topic. Any
detractors? :)
Transcoding as in vcr to mpegs? I wasn't suggesting XP was utterly
entirely useless. Video editing in a modern sense requires loads of
processing h.p. to be efficient. And no transcodimg is necessary.
Certainly
not an expert. But I should think older hardware
would be very very slow.