On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 06:10, Sellam Abraham via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
If you use
a computer that simultaneously is or can be used by other people via
multiple concurrent user sessions across whatever signal path, whatever the
setting, it is *not* "personal".
I disagree. You are trying to make a binary yes/no split when it just ain't so.
Take, say, a Compaq Deskpro 386, a late-'80s desktop. It's indubitably a PC.
Now boot CDOS-386 on it. Plug a couple of terminals into its serial
ports. Now it's a multiuser host. No hardware change.
Stick a DOS floppy in, reboot. It's a single user PC again.
There is no hardware change. Ben Idontneedasurname says if it doesn't
have a multitasking OS it's not a PC.
Who is right?
Neither of you. You are trying to make out this is an absolute split. It's not.
I used DESQview to multitask DOS apps. Resolutely single user. I know
people who used DESQview to run BBSes. Definitely multiuser.
But the _same software_.
But could one ordinary person afford it? At least in some countries,
e.g. where it's made or at least designed? That is a clearer, easier
split, I think.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven(a)cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven(a)gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624 277612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884
Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053