It was many years ago so my memory is spotty. I think that yes they rolled back my edits
and "explained" on the Talk page. Their explanation sounded specious to me. If
you want to look, it was about the RIAA playback and recording curves. I asserted that
the Y axis was velocity, not amplitude, backing it up with quotes from the DRA and the
service manual for a cutting lathe, and they flatly denied it. When I pushed back they
called it original research. When I pointed out that the info was published, they said it
was "too niche". I concluded that they regarded the page as their empire, and
I haven't looked since. Gotta pick your battles or you wind up in an xkcd cartoon.
________________________________
From: Alan Perry via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 1:16 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Cc: Alan Perry <aperry(a)snowmoose.com>
Subject: [cctalk] Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol)
In these cases, did someone roll back your changes? Was discussion added
to the Talk tab?
I do enough Wikipedia edits that I get to vote on board membership. Or
used to. I have only done a few edits in recent years. The trickiest
edit has been the page for a woman who was a child actor in the 70s but
is now a doctor. The info in her page was wrong (and unattributed) and
she hasn't done any interviews in 20 years or described in any media
coverage what she has done since leaving the entertainment business. I
got her e-mail address and exchanged messages with her. It was
completely surreal. We discussed what she wants the general public to
know about her now. I asked if she was sure on a few points, e.g., when
I thought it might be too specific on where she is now. What is on the
page about her is what she felt comfortable with (as of 2019-2020). To
get around the "no original research" thing, I added a Talk tab section
explaining all of the above and offered to make the email exchanges
available (with her contact info redacted). That was 5-6 years ago and
no one has edited the page since.
If someone has something they think should be in a Wikipedia page and
had it removed, I can help get it added to a Talk tab entry at a minimum.
On 2/17/25 8:26 AM, David Wise via cctalk wrote:
In my case, the self-appointed gatekeeper rejected
material from the AES Disk Recording Anthology.
________________________________
From: Ken Seefried via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2025 12:55 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Cc: Ken Seefried <seefriek(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 1:53 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
I admit to a bit of pique here: I don't even
bother updating Wikipedia
articles
anymore because they'll always get reverted by someone with less of a life
than
me for any number of specious reasons.
This is an almost perfect description of my experience of Wikipedia.