On 19/01/2025 15:37, ben via cctalk wrote:
On 2025-01-19 6:12 a.m., Adrian Godwin via cctalk
wrote:
I like to parse the 'artificial'
differently. It's not AN artificial
intelligence - a manufactured entity that exhibits intelligence -
it's JUST
artificial intelligence - something that appears to be intelligence but
isn't, like artificial turf.
I hope that one day we will have machine intelligences. But I'm
unsure that
merely imitating how they might look is a path to that.
I thought that all was covered on the movie, Metropolis.
Ask HAL 9000 for real answers. I think self aware is needed 1st
and a body, other wise it all just text word games.
Now define "self-awareness"! But we're absolutely seeing word games and
probability right now. Like the mechanical Turk, there's nothing
intelligent in the machine.
While we're at it, biological science had clearly been unable to create
life. Not even a single cell. And I've no reason to believe we're about
to see a breakthrough it that either.