Along the same lines as the 640K quote, I vaguely remember reading a book
that quoted Bill Gates when asked about developing any software for NeXTSTEP
(Probably porting Microsoft Office to compete against Lotus Improv and Word
Perfect) where his reply was "Develop for it? I'll piss on it!"
It's been 20 years since I saw that book and I have never been able to
confirm that was something he was quoted as saying, but it would then
explain why Microsoft entirely ignored NeXTSTEP (or they were just too busy
working on Windows and other unix ports).
-John
Hello Chris,
I saw this old post while searching for stuff related to the CPT Phoenix word processors. I was an engineer at CPT Corp. from 1978 thru 1989 and helped design the CPT 8100, 8500, 9000, and Phoenix systems.
The original monitor that I have has burned-out and I am searching for a replacement. You seem to have found/acquired the exact monitor that I have been looking for!
Would you care to sell the monitor, and keyboard too, to me? I would be most appreciative. It would certainly find welcome home, back with one of its original designers.
Best regards,
Rich Jones
Metasoft, Inc.
> 640K was maybe "enough for anyone"
>
> Weird but I even seem to remember someone saying "who woukd been more than
> 64k"
> Ed# SMECC
>
>
>
And let's not forget "what's the hardest part about emulating Gerald Ford
on a PDP-8? Figuring out what to do with the other 3K."
Hi all,
I'm looking for various Itanium systems:
IBM eServer xSeries 380
IBM IntelliStation Z Pro Type 6894
Fujitsu Celsius 880
Silicon Graphics 750
HP i2000
HP Integrity rx4610
Dell Precision Workstation 730
Dell PowerEdge 7150
If you have a system you want off your hands, I'll pay!
Thanks,
Vivianne
>Message: 21
>Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:35:28 +0100
>From: Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1(a)gmail.com>
>Subject: [cctalk] Re: Getting floppy images to/from real floppy disks.
>
>On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 10:57 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk
><cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, Rick Bensene via cctalk wrote:
<> > an example of early "mobile computing". (Tongue firmly in cheek).
>>
>> The original Osborne 1 had a 12V power input!
>
>Actually it's +12.6V and +5.6V and you have to supply both voltages.
>It's one diode drop to the +5V (logic supply) and +12V (DRAM, disk
>motors, monitor supply), the -5V for the DRAM is produced on the logic
>board.
>
>I am told it was never used and that the Osborne battery pack came
>with an inverter to provide 110V AC.
>
>-tony
It (the Osborne Powr-Pac (tm) ) has a what the manual says is a DC-DC inverter that plugged into a Gould lead-acid battery (or the cigarette-lighter socket in a car) at one end and the AC input of the Osborne 1 at the other. I have read on this list that Lee denies that OCC ever sold them, but I have one that I bought for $50 at Compumat in Chicago on October 10, 1983 -- I still have the unit, receipt, and User Registration card. It came with a glossy-printed grey-and-blue manual, like other contemporary OCC products.
If anyone wants a copy, I can email you a PDF scan of the user manual.
Bob
For various reasons (including, but not limited to, insanity and obsessiveness*) I am building a diode laser based tape punch. It's not specifically for a classic comp, but I'd like to stick with standard format so that it'd be useful for making custom tapes for members in the future. I will probably need to make dozens of tapes so using actual, vintage rolls is out of the question. Does anyone know if 1" tape is used for anything else and where I might find some new? Otherwise I may have to add paper-slitter to my project list and make my own.
*I've had the idea of a lost-media ARG stuck in my head for years.
Hello!
I have an IBM 6152 aka IBM RT system I rescued. (It may be a 6151?)
I'm 90% sure it has colour graphics. The system does seem to POST
correctly (according to the LED on the front) but the CRT is dead. I'm
wondering if anyone has built an adapter to hook this to a VGA
monitor.
I'm a bit confused by the pinout. It has high and low bits for the RGB
(and associated grounds for each colour.) So I'm not sure how that
would work hooking to a more modern monitor.
http://bio.gsi.de/DOCS/IBM/615x/faqshard.html
Otherwise I need a crash course in fixing CRTs.
--
-Jon
+44 7792 149029
Hi:
Doing some research for historical purposed – no litigation at all – trying to identify the first “legal” PC-DOS compatible PC, “legal” in the sense that it’s BIOS was not a copy of an IBM BIOS. Eagle gets the honor of being first MS-DOS compatible and getting sued for copying IBM’s BIOS 😊
The Compaq Portable which shipped in November 1982 is generally credited with the first legal MS-DOS compatible PC. AFAIK it could not run PC-DOS and those applications which depended upon certain IBM BIOS commands would fail.
The first “legal” BIOS is generally considered to be from Phoenix which was announced in May 1984 and so far I have been unable to determine its first system deployments. FWIW Wikipedia points to HP, Tandy and AT&T as some time adopters of a Phoenix BIOS but my research so far is that Tandy’s T1000 family announced in October and November of 1984 was the first system to be PC-DOS compatible and it did not use a Phoenix BIOS! Such PC-DOS compatible HP and AT&T systems were much later and the Tandy BIOS was written by programmers of Tandon Corporation, the OEM supplier of the first Tandy T1000s.
Can anyone identify a PC-DOS compatible PC announced earlier than October 1984? Citations would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
