IBM PC Network
Grant Taylor
cctalk at gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net
Sun May 23 00:00:31 CDT 2021
On 5/22/21 6:50 PM, Lyle Bickley via cctalk wrote:
> Wow, never heard of "Tokenray" ;)
Nor have I.
> BTW: 16 Mbit Token Ring was much more reliable (especially in "noisy"
> environments) and considerably faster with more consistent performance
> than 10 Mbit Ethernet.
I've heard tell that Token Ring worked MUCH better on extremely busy
networks. Purportedly Ethernet starts having problems when there are
more and more systems and / or a higher and higher percentage of
utilization is happening. I seem to remember that Ethernet had problems
starting about 80% utilization while Token Ring could easily handle 95%
utilization or higher.
> plus IBM never upgraded Token Ring past 16 Mbit.
Sure they did.
You can find commercial Token Ring cards that support, 4 Mbps, 16 Mbps,
/and/ *100* Mbps. I see them on eBay monthly.
I heard that IBM developed 1,000 Mbps / 1 Gbps Token Ring in the lab.
But that no commercial products were ever made.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
More information about the cctech
mailing list