Intel 3000 series
spacewar at gmail.com
Sat May 5 10:55:59 CDT 2018
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 20:39 allison via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 09:16 PM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> > I'm not sure how much good a 2900 assembler would be for a 3000 series
> part. The 2900 has an address controller more like a typical micro
> computer, while the 3000 is more like playing a game of chess.
There seems to be the presumption the bit slices have a uniform organization
> like a micro. They generally don not.
AMDASM is a metaassembler; it has no such presumption.
opcodes and micro code are
> and created by the developer and their minions along the lines of some
> architecture they wish to create. they tend to have a pattern and thats
> about it.
AMDASM works fine with that. It can even support bitfields that are
discontiguously stored in the microword.
More information about the cctech