An historical nit about FDDs
Tom Gardner
t.gardner at computer.org
Thu Jul 12 13:02:25 CDT 2018
Hi Chuck
I agree it is easy to convert but I am surprised that a start-up would have the guts to change the "standard," whether it was Memorex, Potter or Century. I think before the 33FD Memorex was the market leader but I could be wrong. I've asked some SA founders the question. Does anyone know any Potter or Century FDD people from the early 70s?
The early HDD interfaces I am aware of used a control cable with an 8-bit bus and a set of tag lines to define the bus - much more expensive to implement than the Step In/Step Out.
Regards,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Guzis [mailto:cclist at sydex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 11:38 AM
To: Tom Gardner via cctalk
Subject: Re: An historical nit about FDDs
On 07/11/2018 11:12 AM, Tom Gardner via cctalk wrote:
> Anyone know where the Step/Direction version of the FDD interface
> originated.
>
> So far as near as I can tell the earliest FDDs (IBM 23FD Minnow and
> Memorex
> 650/651) used Step In/Step Out. The IBM 33FD Igar used direct control
> of the motor.
>
> The earliest Step/Direction FDD I can find is the Shugart 800 which
> first shipped in September 1973.
Shugart is probably it, unless there's a hard drive interface that precedes it. Mostly a minimal bit of logical difference between the Step in/Step out and Step/Direction. One can be converted to the other rather easily.
--Chuck
More information about the cctech
mailing list