Interesting RK8E fault

[Paul Anderson]

Are you using the same pack for the 8 and the 11

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM Bill Degnan via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 1:02 AM Josh Dersch via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:58 PM Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all --
> > >
> > > Finally got all the parts together (and my act together) to actually
> get
> > > an RK05 lashed up to my PDP-8/e -- only took a decade or so :).  I
> fixed
> > a
> > > few problems with the RK05 and it appears to be behaving very nicely.
> > >
> > > The RK8E controller is mostly working properly but fails interestingly
> > > when running the formatter, and during the exerciser -- on cylinder 128
> > and
> > > 192 and very infrequently on cylinder 64 it will get a cylinder
> mismatch
> > > when doing the seek.  When running the formatter during the
> verification
> > > pass, on cyls 64 and 128 if I retry the read it'll continue without
> > issues,
> > > but it's never successful on a retry on cylinder 192.  I tried hooking
> it
> > > to the RK05 in my 11/40 and it exhibits the same behavior, so I'm
> > guessing
> > > the drive isn't at fault.  And the error is consistent across packs (of
> > > which I have only two).
> > >
> > > Apart from that fault the drive and controller seem to work fine -- I
> > > wrote out an OS/8 pack with Adventure on it (or at least the first 191
> > > cylinders of it) and it works without issue.
> > >
> > > Reading the RK8E service docs and schematics, the cylinder address
> > compare
> > > is done by reusing the CRC buffer, so I suspect the issue is in or
> around
> > > there -- the big problem is that debugging it is rather painful since
> > that
> > > logic is in the middle board of a three board set, with jumper blocks
> on
> > > top -- so bringing it out on an extender isn't an option.  I'm curious
> if
> > > anyone's seen this issue or is so very familiar with the logic that the
> > > fault is obvious.
> > >
> > > I suspected the 7496 shift register at E14 which takes in the cylinder
> > > address to be compared w/the header on disk, and I went ahead and
> > replaced
> > > it in the hopes that I'd get lucky, but no go.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any advice?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > >
> > I'll add that during the format/verification the drive seeks properly
> (i.e.
> > it's not missing a step or overstepping), which I've confirmed by
> watching
> > the thing walk through the tracks with the cover off.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
>
> Partitions as rka0 / rka1?
> B
>
> >
>