PDP 11 gear finally moved
Tothwolf
tothwolf at concentric.net
Mon Jul 20 20:02:16 CDT 2015
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Mark J. Blair wrote:
> Now on the topic of capacitors: The only component type that I replace
> on sight at this point are the Rifa paper-dielectric EMI suppression
> caps. Had one go incendiary on me so far, and I do a replace-on-sight
> routine on them because my hypothesis of the failure mechanism(*) leads
> me to believe that they're all likely to burn up once the plastic shell
> has developed any cracks. They're easy to recognize: Rectangular, with
> transparent yellow plastic housings, which are usually crazed with fine
> cracks. Different caps which should not be subject to the same failure
> mechanism are easily available.
>
> (*) Paper dielectric is said to absorb moisture from the atmosphere if
> not sealed. So, I presume that once the yellow plastic shell cracks from
> old age, moisture gets in, and then the caps break down under power. I
> replace these with poly film safety-rated caps with suitable ratings,
> since the poly film shouldn't absorb significant moisture even if the
> housing seal fails.
Absolutely! I didn't mention those in my previous list since I was focused
on aluminum electrolytics, but those yellow Rifa parts are an especially
sore spot in older test gear. My own theory on these is that the swelling
of the paper is what is causing them to crack. I'm not sure what chemical
they treat the paper with, but it apparently doesn't hold up long term
and/or this is just their failure mode as they age and wear out. While
Rifa still makes these very same safety capacitors, I've been replacing
them with MKP types from TDK which won't fail in the same way.
Oddly enough, those failing class X and class Y Rifa parts I see seem to
be early 1980s to mid 1990s vintage gear, which puts them in that same
20-30 year age I tend to use for replacing aluminum electrolytics.
Another capacitor type which I replace on sight are any wax paper
capacitors such as you would find in tube (valve) based equipment. The wax
coated tubular types are easy to spot, but the epoxy covered parts (black
beauty, bumble bee, etc.) fail the same way. After replacing 100s, if not
1000s of the things over the years, I've yet to find one, even NOS (which
always seem to turn up in lots of parts from estates and such), which
would pass a leak test.
I replace wax paper types with polyester (mylar), polystyrene or ceramic
discs, depending on how they are used in the circuit (note however that
for wound foil types, modern replacement parts do not mark the outside
foil, which needs to be at ground potential in many tube circuits,
otherwise the circuit can pick up noise and hum).
More information about the cctech
mailing list