Microsoft open sources GWBASIC

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Fri May 29 11:38:24 CDT 2020


On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 18:17, Toby Thain via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > And I have had earnest youngsters on Twitter and elsewhere very
> > seriously tell me that _no_ language could even theoretically be
> > immune to the problems of C, because _all_ languages are implemented
> > in C at the lowest level.
>
> You understand that this is absolute rubbish, right?

Examples...

"Almost all of these better languages are implemented in C, your OS
likely usese a lot of C or a language that is heavily inspired
by/built upon C. Perhaps it is not the language that is the problem
when you're having trouble with it."

"So, I'm curious what are these so called better languages, and what
were they built on seeing as it couldn't have been any modern
operating system that I could find."

Sometimes I despair...

-- 
Liam Proven – Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk – gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven – Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 – ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053


More information about the cctalk mailing list