Scanning docs for bitsavers
Christian Corti
cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
Tue Dec 3 02:50:09 CST 2019
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, Eric Smith wrote:
> There are newer bilevel encodings that are somewhat more efficient than G4
> (ITU-T T.6), such as JBIG (T.82) and JBIG2 (T.88), but they are not as
> widely supported, and AFAIK JBIG2 is still patent encumbered. As a result,
*NEVER* use JBIG2! I hope you know about the Xerox JBIG2 bug (e.g. making
an 8 where there is a 6 in the original). Alone the idea of multiplying
parts from a scan in other areas is a no go. That's not archiving, that's
dumb. Therefore using compression algorithms like the one used in JBIG2
is discouraged or even forbidden e.g. for legal matters.
Christian
More information about the cctalk
mailing list