Scan of Micro Peripherals Inc MPI 91/92 Product Manual Avail?
Bill Degnan
billdegnan at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 14:28:00 CDT 2018
Hi - I finished the scan of the MPI 91/92. I did it at Kinkos and it cost
me $54, and wow that's expensive. I should have asked before I dropped off
the manual. I kind of assumed it'd be more like $20. I don't have an easy
way to scan a plastic spiral-bound two sided document with pull out
schematics unless I do each page by hand.
If anyone wants the file, it's real nice and suitable for archive.org, and
includes schematics
https://www.vintagecomputer.net/MPI/
So that brings me to the question - Should I buy a nice scanner that
handles two sided and schematic prints?...I have so many things more I
could scan if I had something cost effective. That's the last time I do
the Kinkos thing. I prefer to do this kind of work on my own.
Also of note I just finished the RCA COSMAC Microkit manual MPM 103,
obtained from the Hagley Museum archives in Wilminton, Delaware. They have
a treasure trove there. It's impossible to assemble the Microkit without
the manual, each card has a specific slot in the backplane. This is a
computer made with an early version of the two-chip 1801 CPU card, before
it was called "1801". More info is on my web site. So far I have the
current loop operating but the terminal card appears to be on the fritz or
altered for some other purpose that originally designed. I cannot yet
interact with a teletype. The COSMAC Microkit is a complete microcomputer
that pre-dates by a month or two the MITS Altair. A worthy project.
Next - a nice ROHM 1601 sales brochure.
I try to scan only what appears to not already be available on the
better-known archiving sites.
Bill
vintagecomputer.net/contact.cfm
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:32 PM Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
> just an update, I have not forgotten this task, I just need to find time
> to get to a two-sided printer. I really need to get one for my self with
> big copy bay to handle schematics. That would really accelerate my archive
> work
> b
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:55 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> One last tidbit on the Micropolis floppy drives--the early drives (1014,
>> etc.) used a body/chassis made of steel plate. The later drives (1115)
>> used cast body parts.
>>
>> It's also worth observing that the leadscrew positioner is probably the
>> best, as it's the dominant technology in 135 tpi 3.5" drives.
>>
>> --Chuck
>>
>
More information about the cctalk
mailing list