i860: Re: modern stuff
Kevin Bowling
kevin.bowling at kev009.com
Thu Nov 1 17:15:07 CDT 2018
Yes, they are. There are reference to those machines in the various
nsfnet written histories but not cross linkage to those great
pictures.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:57 PM William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right, thanks. 6611 is correct. I do not think the FDDI or HSSI cards
> made it into those.
>
> The RCS/RI twitter feed has some pictures of NSFnet racks and a F960
> FDDI card. Those were from the GNJ node in Greensboro Junction, NC.
> Were those the pictures?
>
> https://twitter.com/RetroCompSocRI
>
> --
> Will
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:22 PM Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling at kev009.com> wrote:
> >
> > 6611 was the commercialized version. One early model was a standard 7012 desktop with the special cards. A later cost optimized version had a custom PowerPC backplane.
> >
> > There were some good pics of the nsfnet T3 racks I linked onto nekochan forums but that site is gone. Wish people would migrate back to Usenet.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:15 AM William Donzelli via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > So, what is this i960-based card for?
> >>
> >> They were the routers. At the core nodes of the network, there would
> >> be a big RS/6000s (very early POWER1 types) that would each do about
> >> 4-5 high speed interfaces (FDDI, HSSI, and 10base2). Each interface
> >> was one of these cards, so each of the big RS/6000s would have about
> >> 4-5 of these cards.
> >>
> >> IBM tried to commercialize the design, but it was doomed - the routing
> >> engines were very fast, but the internet quickly outgrew the
> >> architecture of the engines, and they apparently needed a complete
> >> redesign to compete. IBM did release very few of these RS/6000s to the
> >> public (I think RS/6000-320Hs with a fancy tag - machine type 6767?).
> >> I have only seen one of these routers in the wild, but most of the
> >> real NSFnet ones (I was decommissioning them, one time with a Sawzall
> >> because of some live tangled cables).
> >>
> >> > Could it be related to what you
> >> > say in your post?
> >> >
> >> > https://imgur.com/NIvQPBv
> >>
> >> Possibly related, but that card is not one of the NSFnet ones.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Will
More information about the cctalk
mailing list