Core memory emulator using non volatile ram.
Eric Smith
spacewar at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 19:42:07 CST 2018
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 12/15/18 10:01 AM, Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk wrote:
> > FRAM or MRAM. I make extensive use of them in my projects.
> >
> > Everspin has a few (all SMT and 3.3v). As I recall they run ~$20/ea for
> 4Mb (512K x 8 or 256K x 16).
>
> As neither MRAM nor FRAM requires a write-after-read refresh, I fail to
> see the "realism" in this that couldn't be satisfied with simple
> battery-backed RAM or even flash-backed RAM.
>
FRAM requires write-after-read refresh, but it's done internally to the
part. That's why FRAM has limited read endurance; each read also does a
write. FRAM endurance is typically 10^14 cycles (check the datasheet of a
specific part), which is adequate for most uses.
More information about the cctalk
mailing list