Oscilloscope Recommendation

[Michael Thompson]

Great idea about looking for a non-profit discount. That might not work for
the Chinese 'scopes, but it could make the US 'scopes prices more
competitive.


On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've almost always used TEK scopes, and liked them. What ever you choose,
> see if they will cut you a good deal for being a educational or non-profit.
> A lot of companies will, especially on a discontinued model.
>
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Michael Thompson via cctech <
> cctech at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the recommendation
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Apr 29, 2017, at 4:30 PM, allison <allisonportable at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 04/29/2017 01:28 PM, Michael Thompson via cctech wrote:
>> >> The RICM just received $1,000 to buy a new oscilloscope. I would like a
>> >> four channel. and color would also be nice. The bandwidth doesn't need
>> to
>> >> be high because we usually work on ancient equipment.
>> >>
>> >> What would you suggest?
>> >>
>> > I use a RIgol DSO at work to replace a 200mhz Tek with power issues.
>> Far better scope.
>> > For the money we paid, 4 channels and wide band its very decent.  Being
>> able to get
>> > screen grabs to a USB stick is a big plus.
>> >
>> > I personally have a Rigol DS815T spec analyser with tracking generator
>> and its a good performer.
>> > Not up to the standards of a R&S FSH6 but about 1/15th the price.
>> >
>> >
>> > Allison
>>
>
>


-- 
Michael Thompson