Building the Ultimate Classic Mac.

N0body H0me n0body.h0me at inbox.com
Mon Jul 18 14:44:53 CDT 2016



> -----Original Message-----
> From: aek at bitsavers.org
> Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:41:10 -0700
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Building the Ultimate Classic Mac.
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/18/16 12:38 AM, N0body H0me wrote:
> >The 88k should have
>> been in RISC-based Mac's.  But of course, the 88k's absence was not
>> really
>> Apple's fault, either.  Just another example of 'what could have been'.
>> 
> 
> I worked on Apple's 88K Macs. You wouldn't have liked them.

I'm astounded.  I didn't think any ever made it to prototype or hard-model
stage!  I've seen bare boards for these (up to this point) mythical
beasts, but never a living, breathing machine.  Must have been a piece
of work.  Do any functional machines still exist?  How did you encounter 
them?

____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!




More information about the cctalk mailing list