Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info?
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
Thu Sep 24 16:38:22 CDT 2015
dps 8 was a phx ax big H project as I remember
but new enough that I would have stored manuals rather than
had them in active reference section. will keep eyes out! -Ed#
In a message dated 9/24/2015 1:43:14 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
scaron at umich.edu writes:
I think this anecdote is also referenced in the AFDC installation site
story on multicians.org? Sounds familiar...
Best,
Sean
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:42 PM, steve shumaker <shumaker at att.net> wrote:
> On 9/23/2015 2:44 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>
>> Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside
>> workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this
>> model
>> (a badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take
>> some detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it
up
>> (it's very, very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit
>> pictured on this site:
>> http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm
>>
>> Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What
have
>> I gotten myself into with this thing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Josh
>>
>>
>>
> browse here and elsewhere for WWMMCCS history and beginnings of
> GCOS/DPS-6/Honeywell 6000
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Military_Command_and_Control_System
>
>
> One legend that gets trotted out whenever you speak of WWMMCCS is the
> cookie monster that was on terminals in the Pentagon installation of
> WWMMCCS. As the legend goes, at random intervals, the console would go
> blank, operators would loose control and a message would display
something
> to the effect "cookie monster hungry - feed me". Supposedly once you
> typed in one of several cookie names, the routine would release the
system
> back to the operator. I personally know a retired AF IT manager who
> worked WWMMCCS and swears its a true story...
>
> Suspect you will find very little material other than what Al has - it
> wasn't a particularly common installed setup.
>
> Steve
>
>
More information about the cctalk
mailing list