AOL (Was: Substituting DSHD for DSDD disks (or DS2D
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
Sun Oct 25 15:19:43 CDT 2015
AOL was a good model for general consumers. also remember many
people used AOL before the www was all the rage so... you stay with
something you have alreay learned.and AOL was accessible anywhere in the world
for the most part whereas podunk mom and pop ISPs had local phone
numbers. This was important if I was say going to UK or France for more
than a few days as dialing back to a podunk in phoenix would not only
be damn expensive but the quality of connection thru the long distance
would no doubt be horrible...
Aside from our AOL account we had a podunk that had two brothers
that seemed as stupid as Daryl and his other brother Daryl in the Bob Newhart
show that ran it. Eccch!
The game changer for local residents though was the cable companies
and telecoms offering Internet service... same bill as their telephone or
cable tv easy to sign up... and remember at first the hi speed
connects were though the telco for us and we had AOL but after I
quit travels just had a minimal AOL account... why? lots of people I
have known for eons can still contact me there.
Why do I still use it? because my friends know to reach me there.
Why will I always have an aol account forever? well until all my friends
pass on or I pass on it is a connection medium!
Ed #
Uptime seemed to be better on also than some of the podunks
In a message dated 10/25/2015 12:40:46 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
cisin at xenosoft.com writes:
[AOL]
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015, ben wrote:
> I suspect the reason they failed was not service
> but a) PC's had games b) Ma Bell wanted a arm and a leg
> for long distance connections.
Some of their early efforts to COMPETE AGAINST the internet helped
establish outfits like Netcom, and were a boost to ISPs.
Perhaps Ed (still using AOL) would have some insight into what caused
their decline.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
More information about the cctalk
mailing list