From aliensrcooluk@yahoo.co.uk Sat May 15 12:48:47 2010 From: aliensrcooluk@yahoo.co.uk To: test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org Subject: HTML coding ( was Re: Lisa C and Lisa FORTRAN) Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 18:48:47 +0100 Message-ID: <006e01caf467$db7d20e0$3b075f0a@user8459cef6fa> In-Reply-To: <4BEDF26F.10003@neurotica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2686006226450708078==" --===============2686006226450708078== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave McGuire" To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:01 AM Subject: Re: HTML coding ( was Re: Lisa C and Lisa FORTRAN) > On 5/14/10 7:58 PM, Andrew Burton wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dave McGuire" > > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" > > > > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:14 PM > > Subject: Re: HTML coding ( was Re: Lisa C and Lisa FORTRAN) > >> Having stuff enclosed with but followed by unencapsulated > >> body text is kinda ugly, IMO. Know what I mean? > >> > > > > I guess. Noone (except maybe software) bothers encapsulating paragraphs (P > > tag) anymore though, with the P tag only used at the start of paragraphs. Or > > atleast in the code I have seen. > > It's actually kinda the opposite of that.

effectively didn't > *have* a closing tag many years ago; nobody ever did it. Only with the > XHTML stuff is there more of an insistence in opens with matching closes. > > (not to be contrary, but..) > Oh, right. I didn't know that. Regards, Andrew B aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk --===============2686006226450708078==--