Bug-for-bug compatibility [was RE: SimH DECtape vs. Tops-10 [was RE: Writing emulators [Was: Re: VCF PNW 2018: Pictures!]]]
dpi at dustyoldcomputers.com
Wed Feb 28 11:52:37 CST 2018
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Rich Alderson via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Fast forward 20 years, to Living Computer Museum, where a KI-10 based
> was undergoing restoration. Diagnostics were needed, so the resident
> programmer laid hands on the MAINDEC sources for the KI-10 and proceeded to
> compile them all and generate paper tapes of the results. All went
> well until the multiplication test.
> The diagnostic source for this test uses a macro to build a set of test
> for X**2 where X is a power of 2. Internally, Macro-20 uses the IMULM
> instruction to build the results. In the KA-10 manual, IMULx of 2**35 *
> is supposed to store the high order part of the result into the 36 bit word
> addressed by the instruction, and set the overflow bit.
> On the Toad-1 (and on the Toad-2 prior to our discovery of this bug), a
> zero is
> stored instead. Since we compiled the KI-10 diagnostics on the Toad-1,
> incorrect result was placed on the diagnostic paper tape, and the KI-10
> to fail the diagnostic. Imagine our chagrin when days of trying to
> correct the
> problem led to the conclusion that the diagnostic was incorrect.
This is a great story! And it probably indicates that when developing the
Toad-1 this particular
diagnostic was never run from an original DEC generated tape or the Toad-1
would have failed
the diagnostic. Alternatively assembling the diag on the restoration
project would have yielded
a working multiply.
So is someone going to fix the multiply instruction in the 20+ year old
PDP-8 SN 1175
More information about the cctech