S/36 in Milwalkee

Al Kossow aek at bitsavers.org
Sat Nov 5 14:10:09 CDT 2016

oh, and FWIW the 'monitor' you need is a Twinax terminal.
They are a bit more comomon than coax ones and seem to be
less desirable.

On 11/5/16 12:07 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
> On 11/5/16 11:24 AM, Jason T wrote:
>> I'm guessing
>> it's far more due to IBM having never released anything close to
>> technical documentation on the architecture
> S/32 - 36 are fairly well documented. It's just non-trivial to do the work
> and would require someone to reverse-engineer with a machine next to them.
> S34 would probably be easier though since it only has one processor and
> didn't have quite as much LSI in it.
> If you need some place to dump the resulting scans and disk images, I can
> put them on bitsavers. I still have several boxes of S/36 documentation in
> the backlog.

More information about the cctech mailing list