OSX, OS/2, ECS, and Blue Lion (was Re: NuTek Mac comes)
lproven at gmail.com
Sun Jul 17 09:48:34 CDT 2016
On 15 July 2016 at 20:48, Jerry Kemp <other at oryx.us> wrote:
> I guess I am glad that someone getting something positive from windows.
> I have never viewed it as any more than a virus distribution system with a
> poorly written GUI front end.
I am ambivalent. I don't particularly like it any more, but the
reasons are secondary: the poor security, the copy protection, the
poor performance because of the requirement for anti-malware, etc.
The core product was pretty good once. Windows 3.0 was a technical
triumph, Windows for Workgroups impressive, and Win95 a tour de force.
For me, Win 2K was about the peak; XP started the trend of adding
bloat, although it did have worthwhile features too.
Win95 was vastly easier to get installed & working than OS/2 2, it had
a better shell -- sorry, but it really was -- better compatibility and
better performance. No, the stability wasn't as good, but while OS/2 2
was better, NT 3.x was better than OS/2 2.x et seq.
It would be technically possible to produce a streamlined,
stripped-down Windows that was a bloody good OS, but MS lacks the
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)
More information about the cctalk