VMS stability back in the day (was Re: NuTek Mac comes)
a.carlini at ntlworld.com
Sat Jul 16 17:56:27 CDT 2016
On 15/07/16 14:49, Swift Griggs wrote:
> All I'm saying is that the presence of multiple IP stacks looks to me
> to be unwieldy, organic, and incremental.
VMS came with DECnet built-in (although you had to license it). If you
wanted TCP/IP there was UCX, which you had to install separately.
The other TCP/IP stacks came from 3rd party vendors. That's why there
were multiple implementations of TCP/IP for VMS.
> DECnet might be totally integrated and awesome, but it's also
The specs were (and are) freely available. (I'm not 100% sure that they
were free-as-in-beer back then, but they are now).
There was at least one implementation for Linux and (I think ...)
another for Solaris. cisco also supported DECnet in some of
> seldom used,
Seldom used *now*. All the VMS systems I used commercially back then
made use of DECnet.
> and seems to mean different things to different people since it was
> developed in "phases" which bear only loose resemblance to each other
> in form & function. -Swift
IPv4 and IPv6 are also only loosely related. At least the DECnet phases
were sequentially numbered :-)
(I'm assuming that Phase II existed at some point before Phase III,
which definitely did exist. I also
assume that Phase I only acquired that designation once Phase II appeared!)
arcarlini at iee.org
More information about the cctalk