One's complement - was Re: Rich kids are into COBOL
toby at telegraphics.com.au
Sun Mar 1 17:05:54 CST 2015
On 01/03/15 6:42 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On 2015-03-01 06:14, Jon Elson wrote:
>> On 02/28/2015 04:59 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>> Not that Unix was ever written in B anyway, but I believe that B did
>>>>> exist for the PDP-7.
>> I looked up the instruction set of the PDP-7, ghastly little machine,
>> a PDP-8 extended to 18 bits. ...
> The ones and twos complement is the most interesting part. I suspect
> that is because they really had decided that twos complement was the
> future. However, the DEC 18-bit series really started with the PDP-1,
> and all follow on machines were somewhat backwards compatible, and the
> PDP-1 was actually a ones complement machine. The only one DEC built
> that way. So all followon 18-bitters would have to keep the capability,
> I guess.
Studying the CDC 6000 instruction set (through the Grishman book) really
gives me the impression one's complement would be quite a headache to
More information about the cctalk