IBM 2260 acoustic delay line
phb.hfx at gmail.com
Sun Dec 13 10:53:01 CST 2015
On 2015-12-13 4:28 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 12/12/2015 07:41 PM, dwight wrote:
>> I would assume it makes no sense to have it in the cable. It is
>> acoustic not electronic. Typically it would be a loop. Data and
>> possibly clock goes in one end.
> As a practical example, consider the Packard-Bell 250 computer. No,
> not the Packard-Bell PC of the Israeli tank driver and his buddies,
> but the real Packard Bell, maker of consumer radio and TV gear and
> aerospace electronics.
> Since the thing could run from an ordinary wall outlet (something
> around 1200W) and used only about 300 transistors (and lots of
> diodes), it's pretty amazing for a 1961 22-bit minicomputer.
> It used magnetostrictive delay line memory, which is what I'd have
> thought that the 2260 would have used. Oh well, I guess IBM did
> things their way...
The 2260 control unit did use magnetostrictive delay line memory as did
a few other IBM machines I am familiar with. See
https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_ibm2260Y27ar68_33742632 there is a
very good description of the delay lines in that manual.
More information about the cctalk