Yay, now I need some Osborne boot media!
cclist at sydex.com
Mon Nov 24 13:58:18 CST 2014
On 11/24/2014 11:25 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I guess I don't understand this. Single-density FM and double-density MFM
> have the same maximum number of flux reversals per unit distance (which is
> how the RX02 can write double-density data on a single-density floppy). So
> from the magnetic domain perspective, the coating can't really see any
> difference between single-density FM and double-density MFM. So what's
> the difference, if any, between a disk which is "rated for FM" and one
> "rated for MFM"?
That one had me puzzled as well. In terms of *labeling*, some
manufacturers DID label their media as single- or double-density, which
to me means nothing more than they were verified using that particular
Much the same situation exists for 5.25" media labeled "48 tpi", "96
tpi" or "100 tpi".
More information about the cctalk